When BMW's controversial iDrive system launched in 2001, early adopters didn't know they were paying $70,000 to become unpaid beta testers.
The system was so confusing that drivers literally couldn't figure out how to turn on the air conditioning! Meanwhile, Toyota and Lexus owners were quietly enjoying their supremely reliable vehicles, wondering what all the fuss was about.
- Here's the reality: 45% of newly redesigned vehicles in Consumer Reports' 2019 survey showed below-average predicted reliability, while only 33% had above average predictions. That means nearly half of all first-year buyers were essentially paying full price for the privilege of discovering problems.
The Hard Data Behind the Old Wisdom
"Years of assessing reliability has shown us that the first years of a new model usually have the most problems, and those issues tend to get worked out over time," confirms Consumer Reports. Their analysis of 420,000 vehicles spanning the 2000 to 2019 model years reveals a clear pattern. First-year models statistically DO have more issues than later ones.
This isn't opinion. It's mathematical fact backed by decades of ownership data.
But here's where it gets interesting: not all manufacturers are created equal. Toyota and Lexus often buck this trend entirely. The redesigned 2019 Toyota Avalon and Lexus ES both achieved well above average first year reliability scores. Meanwhile, other brands…..... well, let's examine some cautionary tales.
When "All-New" Becomes “All-Problems”
Remember the 2018 Honda Odyssey? After earning solid reliability marks in 2017, the redesigned 2018 model lost Consumer Reports' recommendation due to multiple infotainment and power equipment failures. The problems persisted through 2019. Owners who thought they were getting Honda's legendary reliability instead got a $35,000 lesson in early-adopter regret.
"I know Honda!" one frustrated owner told me after his third dealership visit. “This was supposed to be bulletproof!”
Tesla provides perhaps the most dramatic example. Early Model S owners experienced what one industry analyst called "staggering" drivetrain failure rates. Data suggests two-thirds of 2012-2013 Model S drivetrains needed replacement within 60,000 miles. Yet by 2019, Tesla had largely resolved these issues.
The pattern repeats across the industry:
- BMW's N20 2.0-liter engine (2012 - 2014): Timing chain failures plagued early adopters until BMW redesigned the system in 2015.
- Nissan Leaf battery packs (2011 - 2012): Rapid degradation forced Nissan to introduce the improved "Lizard" pack in 2013.
- Jeep Wrangler valve guides (2012 - 2013): Fixed by 2014 after numerous warranty claims.
Each fix came at the expense of early buyers' peace of mind and time.
How Manufacturers Use You as Their Final QA Department
Here's what automotive insiders know but rarely discuss publicly: real world testing begins when you drive off the lot. Despite millions spent on development, manufacturers cannot replicate every driving condition, climate, and usage pattern.
The first 18 - 24 months of production serve as an extended field test. Customer complaints, warranty claims, and failure patterns inform running production changes. By year three or four of a model's life cycle, most significant issues are resolved.
"We had no idea the air conditioning compressor would fail in Arizona heat combined with stop and go traffic," an engineer from a major German manufacturer confided. “Our testing didn't account for that specific combination of conditions.”
The Brand Reality Check
Some manufacturers handle first-year launches better than others. Toyota's methodical development process, involving extensive real world testing and conservative engineering changes, typically results in reliable first year models. Mazda, despite being smaller, also shows strong first-year performance.
Conversely, brands pushing cutting edge technology or complex engineering solutions face higher first year risks. BMW's early iDrive, Volkswagen's first generation DSG transmissions, and virtually any complex infotainment system launch demonstrate this pattern.
"My BMW dealer knew about the iDrive problems," recalls longtime BMW owner Michael Chen. “They basically said, 'Give us six months and it'll work properly.' I paid $70,000 for a promise!”
The Stories They Don't Tell You
Sarah Williams bought a first year 2020 Ford Explorer ST in November 2019. "I wanted to be the first in my neighborhood with the new design," she explains. By month three, she'd experienced transmission shuddering, infotainment freezing, and paint defects.
"The service advisor actually said, 'Yeah, we're seeing this with the early builds,'" Williams recalls. “EARLY BUILDS! I didn't know I was buying an early build!”
Meanwhile, her neighbor who waited and purchased a 2022 Explorer has experienced none of these issues.
Technical Cost Reduction
When "Improved" Means “Cheaper”
Here's a dirty secret: while manufacturers fix first-year problems, they simultaneously implement Technical Cost Reduction (TCR) programs. These systematically remove features and downgrade materials to improve profit margins.
The 2014 BMW i3 featured metal glovebox locks, seat netting, and leather armrests. By 2021, BMW had replaced the metal lock with plastic, removed the netting entirely, and substituted leatherette for leather. Each change saved money while maintaining the vehicle's basic functionality.
David Tracy of The Autopian documented these changes: “It's a tough pill to swallow when you've gotten used to the early vehicle quality.”
The Sweet Spot Strategy
The optimal purchasing window typically falls between years three and five of a model's production run. Early problems are resolved, but cost cutting hasn't significantly degraded the ownership experience. Features may have been added, technology updated, and manufacturing processes refined.
Consumer Reports data consistently shows this pattern across manufacturers and model types.
Brand-Specific Guidance
- Safe first year bets: Toyota, Lexus, Mazda typically launch with above-average reliability.
- Proceed with caution: German luxury brands, especially with new technology integration.
- Avoid entirely: Any manufacturer launching completely new platforms, powertrains, or complex technological systems.
The Bottom Line
"I can tell you with absolute certainty," explains Jake Fisher, Consumer Reports' senior director of auto testing, “reliability minded consumers would be best served by forgoing brand new vehicles in their first model year.”
The data supports this advice overwhelmingly. Unless you genuinely enjoy early-adopter status and have tolerance for multiple service visits, patience pays. The manufacturers will work out the bugs using other customers' time and money.
Your move: Let someone else be the guinea pig, then swoop in when the problems are solved and the vehicle has proven itself. Your future self will thank you during those worry-free road trips while early adopters are scheduling their fourth warranty appointment.
Sometimes the old wisdom exists for good reason. This is one of those times.
Comments (0)
Please login to join the discussion
Be the first to comment on this article!
Share your thoughts and start the discussion